pdosmall.gif (6581 bytes)

The Minor Planet Observer
and
Palmer Divide Observatory

2007 Shoemaker Grant Recipient

Planetary.gif (18781 bytes)

 

External Links
(opens new window)

Buy MPO Software

MPO Support

CALL web site

Society for Astronomical Sciences

99999999999999999999

Home
Up

 

PhotoRed Reductions Routines - First Order (Comp Star)

PRFOEComps.gif (56684 bytes)

This method uses the instrumental magnitudes and air mass values from Canopus-like data in a least squares solution to find the extinction coefficients in magnitudes per unit of air mass. The data can come Canopus by importing one or more sessions or by using the Differential photometry wizard in PhotoRed. The former makes sense if you did a long time series and measured images in Canopus. The latter works is you’re trying to get some quick FOE values from a few sets of images of the same field taken over a range of air masses.

All other considerations aside, a star gets brighter as it rises because its light travels a shorter distance through the atmosphere and so there is less absorption (extinction). This continues until the star reaches the meridian. After that, the star dims as gets lower and so its light goes through longer paths through the atmosphere.

Photometric reductions can be based on the instrumental magnitude outside the earth’s atmosphere, i.e., exoatmospheric magnitudes. The extinction value is applied via the simple formula

mo = mi - k’X
where mo   exoatmospheric magnitude
      mi   raw instrumental magnitude
      k’   extinction value in magnitudes/air mass
      X    air mass at the time of the observation

PhotoRed finds the value for k’ in each filter by plotting the raw instrumental magnitude of a comparison star for each observation versus the air mass at the time of the observation.

The plot above shows an example of the results after running this routine. Of course, you must be sure that the comparison was not a variable; this can be accomplished very easily in Canopus.

The biggest problem with this method is that it depends on the sky conditions being nearly identical throughout the night. If clouds or haze move in, they can cause the stars to dim artificially and so the solution is skewed. This is why the data is plotted. If there are "bad" data points, you can remove these from the calculations and get a better estimate of the true value. If, however, conditions slowly deteriorated through the night, the results are really useless. The comp star method is not the preferred method for those working in less than all-night all-sky photometric conditions. The value you find may not be the correct value because of changes during the night. Furthermore, that value may not be the one that was "in effect" at the time you took images of a standard field for finding the transforms and nightly zero points. This can skew your final results significantly. If at all possible, you should use the Modified Hardie method for first order extinction.

 

This site is best viewed at 1024x768 and higher

This page was last updated on 01/19/11 05:14 -0700.
All contents copyright (c) 2005-2011, Brian D. Warner
Trademarks are the property of their respective owners